On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, George Herbert wrote: > For liquids, one might consider recovering using a front-mounted propellant > tank (possibly open-cell foam filled) with integral nosecone, with > mid-mounted electronics with a really good shock mounting and really SOLID > nose bulkhead between it and the front tank, and just use lawn darting > recovery and assume replacement of the nose tank after flight. One possible downside of this is something Armadillo ran into once: electronics that seemed all right after a mild crash, but in fact were flakey and unreliable later. Cracked traces or solder joints? Recovering the electronics package sufficiently intact to get the data out is one thing; treating it gently enough that you can still depend on it for future flights is a rather more demanding requirement, and a somewhat ill-defined one too. Henry Spencer henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) (regexpguy@xxxxxxxxx)