[AR] Re: "How Hard Can It Be" rocket episode

  • From: Henry Spencer <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:55:17 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, George Herbert wrote:
> For liquids, one might consider recovering using a front-mounted propellant
> tank (possibly open-cell foam filled) with integral nosecone, with
> mid-mounted electronics with a really good shock mounting and really SOLID
> nose bulkhead between it and the front tank, and just use lawn darting
> recovery and assume replacement of the nose tank after flight.

One possible downside of this is something Armadillo ran into once:  
electronics that seemed all right after a mild crash, but in fact were 
flakey and unreliable later.  Cracked traces or solder joints?

Recovering the electronics package sufficiently intact to get the data out 
is one thing; treating it gently enough that you can still depend on it 
for future flights is a rather more demanding requirement, and a somewhat 
ill-defined one too.

                                                           Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                      (hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
                                                        (regexpguy@xxxxxxxxx)


Other related posts: