Cd is sensitive to the L/D of the orifice, a wider orifice through the same plate can have a lower Cd because of that, if it's in a certain range. As David said, Cd is very sensitive to inlet geometry. There's a good NASA SP on orifice geometry, definitely worth looking up. On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Redacted sender gnsortino@xxxxxxxxx for DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was just performing some flow tests of my injector with water and I > noticed that the Coefficient of Discharge (Cd) surprisingly changed from > 0.65 to 0.47 when the orifice diameter was also changed from 0.23 in to > 0.035 in. In both of these cases the downstream pressure was ambient, > however, for the first test the upstream pressure was about 412psi although > for the second it was closer to 380 psi. Presumably the pressure difference > is due to my regulator unable to keep up with higher flow-rates. > > > > I have 3 theories about what could possibly cause this difference: > > (1) Cd is sensitive to the orifice diameter (eg. The larger the diameter > the lower the Cd) > > (2) Cd is sensitive to the upstream pressure or pressure drop > > (3) A combination of 1 and 2 > > > > My suspicion is that most of the difference is due to higher pressure > drop. Unfortunately, I don’t have an easy way of proving this without > buying a new regulator. > > > > Does this this theory somewhat make sense? I also found 2 links to > formulas online (both formulas are fairly similar) that estimate Cd. Is > this a viable approach to do at least a first approximation of correct Cd > values? > > > > *http://www.valvias.com/flow-equations-discharge-coefficient-c.php* > <http://www.valvias.com/flow-equations-discharge-coefficient-c.php> > > *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_coefficient* > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_coefficient> > >