Graham Sortino (Redacted sender gnsortino@xxxxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote: > Apologies... yes that was a typo. The orifice diameters are 0.023 and > 0.035 respectively. Ah - how did you measure the diameters then? I'd be even more inclined to suspect either or both of my previous suspicions, with such small diameters... small burrs etc. can make a significant difference, and there's the question of how exactly one has achieved the design diameter in actual practice. Were these tests done with single holes or with arrays of similar holes? -dave w