I'm sure their will be. I'm not putting the unit down. I'm simply saying that right now I heard it has a lot of bugs and until they are resolved, it is not worth my money. Anthony ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cynthia Handel" <cindy425@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <optacon-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:43 PM Subject: Re: Camera That Talks >I understand that there's supposed to be some improvement in reading curved > surfaces, in future software upgrades of the KNFB Reader. > > Cindy > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ham Steve" <k8sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <optacon-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:35 PM > Subject: Re: Camera That Talks > > > Charles, > > I think this isn't a real workable idea. If one had a camera such as the > NFB Reader, which operates by taking a picture of a page from about > sixteen > inches away, depending on material, there wouldn't be the immediate > feedback > which we have in an optacon. This was the main drawback to Oleg's P2RD > machine, IMO. YOu could not easily scan an image and look for certain > areas > without zooming in and retaking the picture, if it were possible to do. > > A second delay in the KNFB implementation is that there is about an eight > second delay from when you snap the pictyure until it goes through its > auto-focusing routine and actually snaps the picture. > > Yes, it will read some rounded containers; probably a 90 degree swath, not > really sure on how wide of a band it will read, but it can't be much wider > than that. > > Steve > Lansing, MI > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Charles Pond" <dg140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <optacon-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 4:48 PM > Subject: Re: Camera That Talks > > >> rather than simply rebuilding the optacon using the original circuit >> designs with today's technology, it might be sensible to build a >> USB-compatible tactile array in a box with the needed controls, and plug >> it into something like this "camera that talks". I other words, alter >> and >> refine oleg's readiog machine-based approach. Does it make sense to >> re-develop a stand-alone optacon? From what I am piecing together over >> time of how the optacon R1D and II work (here a little, there a little), >> and with today's technology, it would seem feasible to build an optacon >> about the size of a cassette tape case or thereabouts. (maybe not >> including battery?) >> >> Charles >> >> >> To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: >> >> optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the >> quotes) in the message subject. >> >> Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a >> message >> to: >> >> optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the >> quotes) in the message subject. >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: > > optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the > quotes) in the message subject. > > Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message > to: > > optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the > quotes) in the message subject. > > > > > To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: > > optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the > quotes) in the message subject. > > Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message > to: > > optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the > quotes) in the message subject. > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.9/382 - Release Date: 7/4/2006 > > To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject. Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject.