[AR] Re: MSR reactors.

  • From: Peter Fairbrother <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 21:16:30 +0100

On 13/07/2019 20:56, William Claybaugh wrote:

Apollo was estimated at the time as having a one in five probability of loss of crew.

A decade ago the then Constellation architecture for earth-Moon human transport came in at about one in ten.

The initial flight of the Space Shuttle was retrospectively estimated at one in four; the last flight at one in 63.

And the probability of survival if attacked by a Boomer?

I thought the whole point of Boomers was being... dangerous.

:)

Peter Fairbrother






Bill

On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 1:51 PM Peter Fairbrother <peter@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:peter@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 13/07/2019 20:42, William Claybaugh wrote:
     > Ed:
     >
     > A fair point until one spends some time aboard a boomer and realizes
     > that a significant minority of those tattooed enlisted sailors hold
     > master’s in nuclear engineering....
     >
     > Still, the safety culture is extraordinary in my experience and much
     > could be learned from it even given human spaceflight being far more
     > inherently dangerous.

    More inherently dangerous than a boomer?

    Discuss...


    Peter Fairbrother



Other related posts: