It makes me wonder whether Gmail counts data de-duplication (which Google would be stupid not to use) as a credit in its space allocation... On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Henry Vanderbilt < hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Funny! Cost-effective compression, no, but cute. But a fair number of us > are at one time or another reading this this over limited speed and/or > metered-by-the megabyte links. Just 'cause bandwidth is faster and cheaper > than it used to be doesn't mean it's always fast, or cheap. > > Henry > >