[bksvol-discuss] Re: reading in mp3Re: Re: question: Re: page breaks
- From: Mike Pietruk <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:24:05 -0500 (EST)
Prat
Yet those "romance books" are very readable even with their errors. Now,
if they were science or history text with dates, formulae and assorted
other data, that would be a different story.
What truly would be gained by declining those submissions given that they
are light pleasure reading and little more.
Yes, if you can figure out how the submitter could improve the quality
without much cost or pain, you'd have some rationale.
My hunch is that individual is doing those books for herself first and
foremost; and thereafter sharing.
I am all for quality improvement, teaching improved scanning techniques;
but I cannot favor that at the expense of less material being available.
I understand where you and Guido are coming from, but I don't see why
Jesse's standards of acceptance from last August are suddenly not
acceptible.
This is an instance where it is not broken, so why fix it.
The solution isn't eliminating those contributions; it is making certain
that the downloaders understand the limitations of those submissions and,
based on that, can make an informed decision of whether or not to retrieve
those books.
We'll have to agree to disagree as I doubt
either side will give in to the other. And beyond that, it not our
decision anyway!
Other related posts:
