[AR] Re: Super Loki Dart design documents

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "JMKrell@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:11:56 -0400

Viper 3A - 4.33"    upgraded Super Loki
 
Viper 2  - 7.08"
 
 
Krell
 
 
In a message dated 9/3/2014 6:03:32 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
acesaroni@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
 
Closer  to 7".

Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni  Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941)  360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto

-----Original  Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
Sent:  Wednesday, September 03, 2014 8:53 AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:  [AR] Re: Super Loki Dart design documents

I thought the "Viper" was a  4" version.

Monroe

> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: Super Loki Dart design documents
>  From: "Troy Prideaux" <GEORDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon,  September 01, 2014 7:25 pm
> To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
> 
> Which is kind of the point I was making.
>   
> Troy
>  
>  
> The higher altitudes from  the Viper darts is the result of the 57 lbs of 
propellant compared to the 37  lbs in the Super Loki.  
>  
> In a message dated  9/1/2014 3:46:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
GEORDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  writes:
> >O25000 great stunt motor but not very efficient.   Larger diameter 
> >dramatically increases drag, particularly in the  le, dense atmosphere.
> 
> Not necessarily - for the same aspect  ratio and everything else being 
equal, a larger diameter (or actually larger)  rocket should be more efficient 
than a smaller one in an atmosphere purely due  to *drag* - a larger rocket 
is *less* affected by drag due to the cube-square  law. Of course (with 
everything being equal), larger rockets generally go  faster due to this fact 
and will, as a consequence, experience more drag so  everything isn't equal 
after all and because of this will probably be less  efficient. Nevertheless, 
it should go higher hence demonstrated why the  operational ceilings for 
the larger Viper darts are considerably higher than  the smaller Loki.
>   The O25000 probably is a bit short for a  really efficient dart motor, 
but its burn time will go some way in making up  for that with an efficient 
dart.
> 
> >
> >This is why  all the folks flying N5800s are very amusing.  No doubt 
>  >entertaining but highly inefficient.  Much of the energy of the motor  
> >goes into drag and heat rather than altitude.
> 
>  Indeed. I'm guessing the attraction is the engineering challenge of 
dealing  with the loads experienced with such an aggressive flight profile. 
Flying such  flight profiles is incredibly inefficient, however well engineered 
*boosted  darts* are the most efficient method of obtaining a certain 
altitude within an  atmosphere and gravity field.
> 
> Troy.
> 
> 
>  
> >
> >K
> >
> >Ken Biba
>  >Novarum
> >Managing Director and CTO
>  >+14155775496
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 1, 2014, at  1:28 AM, "Monroe L. King Jr."
> ><monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, that motor would do it. I just  can not afford that one.
> >>
> >> Monroe
>  >>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
>  >>> Subject: [AR] Re: Super Loki Dart design documents
>  >>> From: "Troy Prideaux" <GEORDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  >>> Date: Sun, August 31, 2014 8:22 pm
> >>> To:  <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
>  >>>
> >>> That O-25000 would be a very sweet motor for  a boosted dart :) 
> >>> Very
> >sweet indeed. What  was the 5" variant of the Loki again? Viper?
> >>>
>  >>> Troy
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original  Message-----
> >>>> From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  
> >>>> [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>  >On
> >>>> Behalf Of Mark C Spiegl
>  >>>> Sent: Monday, 1 September 2014 12:39 PM
>  >>>> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Subject:  [AR] Re: Super Loki Dart design documents
> >>>>
>  >>>> Monroe L. King Jr. wrote:
> >>>>>> So  I guess I need to calculate the burn rate and see what COTS 
>  >>>>>> has to
> >>>> offer in
>  >>>>>> that ball park. Who has the fastest COTS propellant?  Has anyone 
> >>>>>> got
> >any
>  >>>> hard
> >>>>>> data on that? I'm sure  someone out there in Arocket land 
> >>>>>> already  know
> >>>> who's got
> >>>>>> the  hottest propellant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cesaroni  O-25000???
> >>>> It's a 5 inch motor but might  work.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cesaroni  N-5800
> >>>> Is a 4 inch motor but only 20kNS  thrust
> >>>>
> >>>> For home brew, Kosdon  had some quick burning motors. You might 
> >>>> find the  formulas online these days.
> >>>>
> >>>>  -->MCS
>  >>



Other related posts: