[GeoStL] Re: A to Z

  • From: Andrew Senger <asenger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:30:40 -0500

-
Why remove the ability to claim caches already found? If you're
worried about some of the people that have been around a long time,
have two FTF: the person that found all new caches, and the person
that claimed any caches (that meet the date requirement).

Andrew Senger
asenger@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.yawetag.net
"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. He's also
postmaster and probably traffic cop, too. All the jobs for sports
referees are probably filled, though." --Lemel Hebert-Williams



On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -
> Well, that is to prevent "dummy" caches from being published. This was drawn
> from a case that one reviewer told me about where a person hid an alphanumeric
> challenge which was reasonably tough to do. Someone a couple weeks later
> literally hid 36 caches, named for each letter and number. That cache went 
> from
> a challenge to bonehead easy. I was not going to have that happen.
 

 ****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including unsubscribing 
from this   
 list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
 
 Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
 Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84
 Missouri Geocachers Forums -->  http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
 Missouri Geocachers Calendar --->  
http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php?app=calendar

Other related posts: