[GeoStL] Re: A to Z
- From: Bear <brawnybear@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:36:02 -0500
-
I think one of the biggest issues with a cache in a nice area is, they are all
taken or have had a cache in the past. The other issue is no one is willing to
find the nice spots. My earthcache, the Narrows, was the last I placed. Not one
log this Summer.
Same with Woody Woodpecker and My Favorite Tree.
Mike Griffin
World Wide Technology, INC.
O - 314-995-8935
C - 314-308-0916
Sent from my AT&T iPhone.
Please excuse any typos.
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:41 PM, "Jim Bensman" <junkmailno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -
> Both of the mentioned challenges are examples of the kinds of caches I wish
> were not allowed. While I wish all ? caches were banned, I do not think
> challenge cache rules should make it easier for some cachers than others.
> Would it be fair to have rules that excluded newer caches from completing
> the challenge? What would cachers think of a challenge cache that required
> one of the caches to be found in 2001, one in 2002, one in 2003, one in
> 2004, one in 2005, and the rest could be found at any time?
>
> I long for the early days of caching when caching was about finding a cache
> in a nice location!
>
> Jim Bensman
> "Nature Bats Last"
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-
>> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Rogers
>> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:35 AM
>> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: A to Z
>>
>> -
>> In that vein, why should someone have to say they are doing the SLAGA
>> challenge
>> before anything can count? Say a person who has done either the MO or
>> IL county
>> challenge wants to do this...why can't their caches count even if they
>> were
>> found after that cache was published? :)
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Senger <asenger@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Thu, August 26, 2010 8:30:40 AM
>> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: A to Z
>>
>> -
>> Why remove the ability to claim caches already found? If you're
>> worried about some of the people that have been around a long time,
>> have two FTF: the person that found all new caches, and the person
>> that claimed any caches (that meet the date requirement).
>>
>>
>>
>> ****************************************
>> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including
>> unsubscribing from this
>> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>
>> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>> Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84
>> Missouri Geocachers Forums --> http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
>> Missouri Geocachers Calendar --->
>> http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php?app=calendar
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including
> unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
> Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84
> Missouri Geocachers Forums --> http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
> Missouri Geocachers Calendar --->
> http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php?app=calendar
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including unsubscribing
from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84
Missouri Geocachers Forums --> http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php
Missouri Geocachers Calendar --->
http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php?app=calendar
Other related posts:
