[bksvol-discuss] Re: reading a book rated fair
- From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:10:57 -0500
No, I'm not arguing, nor would I mind using the daisy file. I too understand
that the brf copy would have back translation errors, but my question more
had to do with someone saying after you submit the improved copy in rtf,
only the brf copy on the site would be improved upon.
This didn't seem right in my mind, so figured I had something wrong.
Tiff
----- Original Message -----
From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: reading a book rated fair
> If you download a brf file and edit in brf and upload that file, you have
> to upload as rtf. With me so far? To get that brf file which you worked
> on saved as an rtf file you translate it back from braille to
> letters. Some of that translating goes wrong. It is just inevitable.
>
> So we are suggesting downloading the html from daisy, saving that as rtf
> (which does not involve braille translation) and reading the rtf file in
> grade two if you want on the braillenote. Any word you want to correct
> will be in expanded grade one mode of course. Hope the explanation
> helps. We all know you are asking so you understand what is happening
with
> the files? Why do you particularly want to stay in brf by the
> way? Reading in rtf in grade two works fine.
>
> E.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
