[bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:20:11 -0600
Bless your heart Shelley, I do believe you could succesfully do this. I
just saw a book scanned by this submitter which has not been validated by
anyone, yet the rating says, "fair, many errors but legible throughout." I
may have a misunderstanding of this, but would that indicate that the
submitter's equipment gave the book this rating? Sometimes being truthful
in a chat,, if done with kindness, is really more thoughtful than silence.
I only saw her name, though, no e-mail address.
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 10:21 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
Would someone have the submitters email. She allows it to show with
uploads.
I don't mind talking to her I promise to be tactful, smile.
Shelley L. Rhodes and Judson, guiding golden
juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Guide Dogs For the Blind Inc.
Graduate Advisory Council
www.guidedogs.com
The vision must be followed by the venture. It is not enough to
stare up the steps - we must step up the stairs.
-- Vance Havner
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
Cindy,
I don't believe that the submitter in question is on this list.
Kellie
Other related posts:
