[bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:53:05 -0600
Here is an angle I don't remember seeing. These books are large print. So
maybe this submitter reads them from the paperbacks and not from the scanned
material. She may have some type of magnifier.
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lisa Leonardi" <lml5280@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
I have to be honest, I haven't downloaded too many books by this submitter.
But I think that's accurate. I don't think the default rating has been
changed... that't not to say that many of these submissions don't deserve
this rating. But I don't think they all do. But I don't think this
submitter changes the default rating because she also doesn't select
categories or fill out any synopsis information.
Lisa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jake" <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:21 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
> Sue,
> If the book marked fair is on the Step 1 Validation page then either
the
> submitter thinks the book to be of a fair quality or did not take the time
> to change the default rating (fair).
>
> Jake
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:20 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Bless your heart Shelley, I do believe you could succesfully do this. I
> > just saw a book scanned by this submitter which has not been validated
by
> > anyone, yet the rating says, "fair, many errors but legible throughout."
> I
> > may have a misunderstanding of this, but would that indicate that the
> > submitter's equipment gave the book this rating? Sometimes being
truthful
> > in a chat,, if done with kindness, is really more thoughtful than
silence.
> > I only saw her name, though, no e-mail address.
> >
> > Sue S.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 10:21 PM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
> >
> >
> > Would someone have the submitters email. She allows it to show with
> > uploads.
> >
> > I don't mind talking to her I promise to be tactful, smile.
> >
> >
> > Shelley L. Rhodes and Judson, guiding golden
> > juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Guide Dogs For the Blind Inc.
> > Graduate Advisory Council
> > www.guidedogs.com
> >
> > The vision must be followed by the venture. It is not enough to
> > stare up the steps - we must step up the stairs.
> >
> > -- Vance Havner
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:13 PM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Nuking Fair submissions
> >
> >
> > Cindy,
> > I don't believe that the submitter in question is on this list.
> > Kellie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts:
