[bksvol-discuss] Re: BRF

  • From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:51:09 -0800

Hi, Charlie. I'm just curious. I personally always use the .brf files, so I 
think they're great, but why would you submit both formats? Was it to eliminate 
the possibility of translation errors? At least in the books I've read, there 
are minor errors, like maybe some words that are separated by spaces when 
standard braille would have them connected, but other than that, I haven't seen 
any major errors, and at least for me, the spacing isn't really a problem. Take 
care.
Julie Morales
Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a rainbow in 
your heart.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Charles Wadman 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:31 AM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: BRF


  Dave,

  I have submitted some Bernard Cornwell books - very probably the ones you are 
referring to. I scanned them into a RTF file, then used software called EDIT-PC 
to translate the RTF into braille. I then corrected and formatted the braille 
(I'm a certified braille transcriber) and submitted the book in RTF and BRF 
formats.  I included a note in the uploads to indicate that the book was being 
submitted in both formats.

  I can't contribute to this discussion on the utility of these formats, but 
maybe this will add a little clarity to how they got there.

  Regards,
  Charlie


  At 08:41 AM 12/15/2004 -0500, you wrote:

    Regarding the BRF files, I was explaining the rational, or thought behind 
why the format was included initially as an option, not on its implementation 
or use since startup.  It seems that when you provide people with options, no 
matter how you perceive they're uses, they will always surprise you and use 
them differently.  While on the subject of surprise, I went back and checked 
the Bernard Cornwell books that I remembered validating that came in as 2 
formats (RTF & BRF), and found you're right, the BRF copies are only 
downloadable as BRF files.  Perhaps I got into some of Guido's 'shrooms' or 
maybe I'm just hallucinating from some other stimulant or depressant, but I 
would have sworn that the last time I checked it out there were Daisy files 
available from the BRF books as well.

    Dave

Other related posts: