[AR] subs (was Re: Re: MSR reactors.)

  • From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 18:16:53 -0400 (EDT)

On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, Anthony Cesaroni wrote:

On the Virginia class boats, the VSL tubes are up front, directly behind the main sonar sphere array and ahead of the torpedoes.

Yeah, vertical-launch *missile* tubes are sometimes put in the aft end of the nose, exploiting the fact that the bulkiest parts of the sonar gear are right forward and the volume behind them is mostly ballast tank. Those tubes carry Tomahawk missiles and such, not torpedoes.

One perennial problem for sub designers is that torpedoes are big and the volume available for storing them is limited, so a sub's total torpedo count is not that large. The submariners understandably dislike dedicating some of their precious torpedo slots to other weapons, especially specialized ones that seem less likely to be useful for their primary missions. Putting some vertical-launch tubes in the forward ballast tank does cause some minor hassles, but makes it possible to accommodate modest numbers of things like land-attack cruise missiles without them occupying any torpedo storage.

The next generation of submarines are evaluating modular, externally mounted torpedoes.

An old idea -- a fair number of early-20th-century subs supplemented their internal torpedo storage with a few external torpedo tubes, which (like the modern vertical-launch-missile tubes) could be reloaded only in port. Sub designers mostly gave up on the idea because torpedoes in those tubes weren't accessible for checkout and maintenance, and their reliability was notoriously poor. Today, maybe it could be made to work well.

Henry

Other related posts:

  • » [AR] subs (was Re: Re: MSR reactors.) - Henry Spencer