I wasn't going to respond but since you deleted the original post, here is what
I want to know:
What I am looking for is a “chemist” who can figure out what chemical(s) were
used by Glauco Partel of Italy, who in the late 1960s forhis Grillo 1 and
Grillo 2 rocketswhich used an exothermic reaction to “instantly” heat the water
to approx 600 deg F. Below are hisstated parameters from his published report:
1. Rapidity of use (the chemical reaction is fully developed within 0.3
sec) 2. Efflux independent of the production of energy (the controls for
the reaction and the efflux are independent, one from the other)
3. No need for any ground equipment 4. The prepackaged, loaded engine can
be stored for an indefinite period of time 5. No need for any
insulation of the engine walls 6. Outstanding reliability and safety in use
7. Low operating temperature (about 600 F) 8. No gas, such as hydrogen,
is produced 9. The reaction takes place in the water and generates a
reaction product entirely soluble in water.
Basically, I want to heat water quickly as my question states. If heating water
to 600 degrees F in .3 seconds does not interest you, fine. Also, I am aware of
ways to increase ISP but I amnot interested in those items at this time.
Regards - John
-----Original Message-----
From: Elliot Robert <elliotr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: arocket <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Jul 27, 2019 6:56 pm
Subject: [AR] Re: exothermic heating of water
I don't care if you spelled it wrong. I read your initial post, found it
interesting, didn't see a end goal stated but I've also deleted it and couldn't
go back and double check it before commenting. I meant what I wrote
respectfully. People pointing out possible flaws in assumption are a great way
to avoid negative work, work that goes towards a dead end technology. To design
a rocket and not care about ISP at the start seemed kinda odd to me. Best of
luck heating up water John.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 5:46 PM John's AOL <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Moot not mute :(
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2019, at 6:43 PM, John's AOL <jkraieski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe my intentions were clearly stated in my original post. How or why I
want to know this should not really be the question because if a solution to my
stated question can not be determined, then anything else I may want to
accomplish is mute.
John
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Elliot Robert <elliotr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Please stick to the topic or move on."
You might find it easier to get people to entertain your development plans if
you gave them some tangible reason to see what you see in this unusual
propulsion setup. If fokes are politely questioning the assumption that this
propulsion technology is worth while by simply pointing out a lack of
performance and you're annoyed they'd dare point out better ways to reach the
same objective, I have to wonder what exactly is the point of your interest in
the subject? To create a rocket with an odd propulsion setup for the sake of
spectacle? if so, it might be better to state that objective clearly rather
than try to police you're own post from any deviation of unsaid end goal.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 4:55 PM <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I’ll do it for $250/hr. but I have a 15 minute maximum. ADD apparently.:-)))
Anthony J. CesaroniPresident/CEOCesaroni Technology/Cesaroni
Aerospacehttp://www.cesaronitech.com/(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota(905) 887-2370
x222 Toronto From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Ben Brockert
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2019 5:09 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: exothermic heating of water
On Saturday, July 27, 2019, Redacted sender jkraieski for DMARC
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please stick to the topic or move on.
This is ARocket, a gaggle of easily distracted internet know-it-alls that
occasionally talks about amateur rockets. If you’re looking for dedicated
on-topic support for your problem, many of us are available for contracting. My
rate is $280/hour, 8 hour minimum. Regards,Ben
