[AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)
- From: qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:46:08 -0600
At 01:37 PM 4/3/2016, you wrote:
Makes me wonder why smaller "traditional" ducted fans (like on
airships or the E-fan aircraft) have much fewer blades, not a big
blade disk like a turbofan.
Ducted fans at the RC level are designed for thrust, after X number
of blades you reach a minimum gain. In most of the high power ones
it's around 12. In an actual turbo fan system you need to compress
the air and for this, to few blades and you can't get the high
compression needed to get to jet part of the system running at
optimum efficiency.
Robert
Other related posts:
- » [AR] airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Rand Simberg
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon) - qbert
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- George Herbert
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- qbert
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Ian Woollard
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Peter Fairbrother
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Evan Daniel
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Ian Woollard
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Ian Woollard