[AR] Re: What happened to the Space Shuttle?

  • From: David McMillan <skyefire@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:16:45 -0500

On 7/22/2019 11:37 AM, Henry Spencer wrote:


And hoping that, e.g., none of their materials suppliers would change their products enough to mess things up.  (It's happened.)

   Or that the "critical specs" on some components don't create a time bomb for the next poor engineer.  I had that happen on a job for a major airframer, too -- they wanted to automate inserting hi-locks through the fuselage skin into the ribs and stringers, and installing and torquing down the nuts on the inside.  The *nuts* should have been the *easy* part -- after all, that's what wobble sockets were invented for, right?  This is a solved problem, with multiple off-the-shelf solutions in other industries.

    One *small* problem:  the customer got their nuts from three different suppliers.  And only spec'd the thread size, torque, shear strength, and *general* outer dimensions.  In production, the nuts were randomly mixed (they bought them by the barrel, almost literally).  And it turned out that each supplier made different choices for the *non-critical* dimensions of the nuts, which in turn was just enough difference to make it impossible to create a securely gripping wobble socket that could reliably hold all three varieties.


Other related posts: