[AR] Re: Vacuum processing of solid propellant

  • From: "Doug Jones" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "randome" for DMARC)
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 11:51:21 -0600

Perhaps you could put the mix in a funnel and extrude it through a small nozzle into the motor case in a vacuum chamber? With a rubber ball floating on the surface to block the funnel as it goes empty.

The slender stream of paste should outgas quite well, and rapidly reconsolidate into a bubble-free mass in the motor. Let it sit in vacuum for a little while to settle, then slowly ramp up pressure and any remaining bubbles should collapse completely.

On 2019-07-07 10:39 AM, William Claybaugh wrote:

I ran some static tests recently using a modified version of the standard RRS composite propellant (10% Al rather than 7%).?? Those tests included applying vacuum to the fully processed mix ahead of casting (5 minutes); the mix was still outgassing when we repressurized

This resulted in an about 5.6 % increase in density, of which 0.9% is attributable to the increased Al loading.

Given that full mixing under vacuum is not viable given the processing equipment available at the MTA, is there another vacuum schedule that might provide still higher density?

Does degassing the liquid components before mixing help or does the subsequent mixing just reintroduce air??? Any recommendations on degassing time after mixing (recognizing that the catalyst is in the mix at this point).

Two static tests, one at 390 psia average and the other at 760 psia average showed a decreased burn rate and a slightly higher ISP as compared to the original mix, as expected.

Bill

Other related posts: