[AR] Re: Bipropellant solid

  • From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:54:11 -0700

Alice was a cryo-solid I thought. This did not appear to be a
cryo-solid? Separate fuel from the oxidizer? There was a lot of H2O2
experiments along these lines in the same project I believe as well.

Indeed interesting. I bet they don't release many details at this point?


Thanks for the link.

Monroe  

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: Bipropellant solid
> From: Plugger Lockett <plugger.lockett@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, October 26, 2014 7:34 pm
> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Dick Stafford reckons it's a nano-aluminum/water propellant.
> 
> Here's another link Monroe.
> 
> http://rocketdungeon.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/new-solid-propellant-separtes-fuel-from.html
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Monroe L. King Jr. <
> monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  I get a broken link. Just fyi
> >
> > Monroe
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: [AR] Bipropellant solid
> > > From: Ben Brockert <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Sun, October 26, 2014 7:11 pm
> > > To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone know what the propellants are?
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.lanl.gov/discover/news-release-archive/2014/October/10.23-rocket-design-flight-tested.phpa
> >
> >

Other related posts: