[AR] Re: Bipropellant solid

  • From: "Anthony Cesaroni" <acesaroni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:54:17 -0400

It's an "all solid, reverse hybrid". As far as I can tell, there is only one 
independent claim and the document is at the published application phase. I'm 
not sure if the examiner will allow the independent claim as there are a number 
of published examples of prior art reduced to practice and disclosed.

 

DSC00319.JPG

 

DSC00346.JPG

 

DSC01760.JPG

Anthony J. Cesaroni

President/CEO

Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace

http://www.cesaronitech.com/

(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota

(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto

 

-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stephen Burns
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:24 AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Bipropellant solid

 

-----Original Message-----

From:  <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ 
<mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ben Brockert

Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 11:13 AM

To:  <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: [AR] Re: Bipropellant solid

 

>Good finds on the patent application. Based on the correlation between 

>the length of a chemical's name and its price on Sigma Aldrich, I 

>wonder how much that little model rocket cost in propellant. Another patent 
>says that all you have to do is oxidize 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole to form 
>3,3'-azo-1,2,4-triazole, nitrate that, and viola, 
>5,5'-dinitro-3,3'azo-1,2,4-triazole.

 

>That is one of the most impressive patent claims I've seen in years.

>If they actually own the entire field of solid bipropellant rockets that will 
>be quite a feat.

 

There is some prior art in the field.  US 3429265 A from 1960 for example. 

 

Also CA 2367192 A1 from 2002 by inventors Anthony J. Cesaroni, Michael J. 
Dennett, Jeroen Louwers

 

There seems to be a distinct lack of reference to Prior Art in modern patents.  
Have they dropped that criteria so I can patent the wheel now?

 

Cheers,

Burnsie.

 

 

Attachment: image002.jpg
Description: Binary data

Attachment: image004.jpg
Description: Binary data

Attachment: image006.jpg
Description: Binary data

Attachment: DSC01760.JPG
Description: Binary data

Attachment: DSC00319.jpg
Description: Binary data

Attachment: DSC00346.jpg
Description: Binary data

Other related posts: