Some observations about a one-handed optacon from someone on a different list. This sprung from the camera that talks stuff. [quoted lines by dg140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 2006/07/07 at 15:39 -0400] >Is it necessary for cognitive reasons for the optacon to have been >two-handed, or was that an artifact of yesteryaar's technology? I think it's an artifact of the technology having been much older. If you add up the weights and the sizes of the tactile array and battery, you'd have had something which would've been way too heavy and big for ease of use and motion with a single hand over a long period of time. I got my optacon back in the mid '70s, so the technology is 30 to 35 years old. >With the optacon as you know, the camera is generally moved from >left to right (with some exceptions). The tactile image moves under the >reading finger on the opposite hand from right to left. Kinaesthetically, >it would seem to be the same for a one-handed optacon. Would this pose a >problem, or is the strange feeling of inner-vertigo I have when I imagine >using a one-handed optacon an indication that there is an intrinsic need >for a two-handed model? No, I don't think so. When I read braille I move my hand from left to right and the dots pass under my finger (on the same hand) from right to left. When sighted people read they move their eyes from left to right and the image passes those same eyes from right to left. That's the way everything works and I think we'd find it completely strange to have it any otehr way. I think a single-handed optacon-like device would have another advantage. The optacon camera had a pair of rollers which forced the user to move the camera in a straight line. This was necessary because of the difficulty of maintaining the correct vertical position when the feedback was coming from the other hand. I don't think a single-handed device would need this as it'd be much more like directly feeling the lines. A bit of vertical jitter wouldn't matter at all since the hand being used would directly know what it itself is doing. This, for example, would sure make reading graphs easier. To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject. Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject.