[bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions

  • From: "Gary Petraccaro" <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:54:57 -0500

Wow.  Imagine getting a garbled book from a reading service where you need
to understand it for class to actually participate.  This person would be
better off getting a good, old-fashioned reader.
The best thing BookShare could do would be to contact the publisher.  It's
better not to have an unreliable source than no source because you'll end up
in the same place either way and in the second instance, you will have more
time to deal with the reality.
I've read more than one message on the K1000 list where people asked for a way to deal with math books of one sort or another. The answer was never all that positive.
Sorry to sound so negative.  I would much prefer not to be.



----- Original Message ----- From: "Grandma Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:54 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality
submissions


Not necessarily, not if one needs it ASAP, for class.
Someone requested Elements of Statistical Reasoning
for a class she's taking, and it was added to the
collection on Thursday, but it's rated Fair. By the
time anyone got it into Excellent shape the class
probably would be over. Hopefully it's useful as it
is, and later on, if she has time during spring break
or this summer, or while she's reading it for class,
she can clean it up and then resubmit it as a BSO.
The immediate need for a textbook book is why I
suggested the exception.

G.Cindy

--- Gary Petraccaro <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The textbooks will always be held to a higher
standard.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Grandma Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 5:23 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to
validating fair quality
submissions


>I agree, and was going to suggest that alternative.
> Maybe it's time the rules changed, *except* for
> textbooks needed by students for class.
>
> G.Cindy
>
> --- Ilene Sirocca <ilenesia@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I certainly sympathize with this suggestion, but
I
>> do have a problem with it.  The problem is that
so
>> far, book are not supposed to be rejected because
>> they are rated fair. If they were, we wouldn't
have
>> the fair rating allowed in the first place.  If a
>> validator who is also a scanner rejects the
original
>> scanner's fair book and then submits a scan of
her
>> own, she takes away the original scanner's
credits,
>> no matter how undeserved they might be in terms
of
>> book quality, and gives them to herself.  This is
>> not your intention, but this is what happens.
>>
>> If Bookshare wants to have more excellent scans
it
>> has to go to the root of the problem and not
allow
>> people to submit fair scans, or maybe even good
ones
>> although that's more debatable I suppose.  Yes,
some
>> scanners may drop out if they're held to a higher
>> responsibility, so that has to be part of the
>> consideration of this matter.  But if excellent
>> books is what we are after, the original rules
have
>> to be tougher.  If just getting as many books as
>> possible is the goal, then fair scans have to
stay.
>> Personally, I'd vote for a slower groth rate and
a
>> higher quality.
>>
>> There's my two cents' worth.
>>
>> Ilene
>
>
> WISH LIST (called Requested Additions To The
Bookshare Collection)is
> available at
>

http://people.delphiforums.com/jamiecalton/Book_Requests.htm
> http://www.friendsofbookshare.org/
>

http://studentpages.alma.edu/~07jmyate/book_requests.htm
>
> www.jbrownell.com for miscellaneous and useful
threads
>
>
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the
subject line.  To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by
itself in the subject line.
>
>
>
> -- > No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.1/1220 -
Release Date: 1/11/2008
> 6:09 PM
>

 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject
line.  To get a list of available commands, put the
word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




WISH LIST (called Requested Additions To The Bookshare Collection)is
available at
http://people.delphiforums.com/jamiecalton/Book_Requests.htm
http://www.friendsofbookshare.org/
http://studentpages.alma.edu/~07jmyate/book_requests.htm

www.jbrownell.com for miscellaneous and useful threads



____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.1/1220 - Release Date: 1/11/2008
6:09 PM



To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: