[AR] Re: Chamber pressure testing
- From: Bill Claybaugh <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:40:09 -0600
There is a standard plumbing tool that consists of a rubber plug with metal
caps at both ends and a bolt running between; the bolt is sealed with rubber
washers. Tightening the bolt expands the rubber plug and seals the opening.
Obviously, this would need to be customized for your specific diameter and I am
skeptical it will hold more than a few hundred psia. Ben's caution about
differential pressure pertains.
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 9, 2014, at 20:31, Ben Brockert <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've seen Robert's approach used up to 600 psi or so.
>
> The lowest force approach is to make a plug rod that has a male gland
> seal that fits into the throat. Retain it via whatever means are
> convenient.
>
> It does mean that the wall just downstream of the throat has a
> pressure on it that is much different than operational in the case of
> a regen system, i.e. normally it would have near throat pressure just
> downstream of the throat but instead it will be at atmospheric, so the
> differential pressure between regen side and nozzle side will be
> higher than operational. Closing out at the exit plane has the
> opposite problem, giving no differential pressure between regen and
> nozzle.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Robert Watzlavick <rocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> My chamber has an open cap on the exit that closes out the regen cooling
>> passages. For pressure/leak tests, I replace that open cap with a solid
>> one. Mine only operates at 250 psi though.
>>
>> http://www.watzlavick.com/robert/rocket/regenChamber3/tests/dsc_1840m.jpg
>>
>> -Bob
>>
>>
>> On 09/09/2014 07:31 AM, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>>>
>>> Chamber for a bi-liquid, has a main joint at the top, several pipe entry
>>> points etc. Operates (or should) at 2,100 psi, so even a tiny leak could be
>>> disastrous - think Challenger.
>>>
>>>
>>> I want to pressure-test it to maybe 3,500 psi, and was wondering if there
>>> was a standard way to seal the nozzle for testing?
>>>
>>> Any other thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Peter Fairbrother
>
Other related posts:
