[procps] Re: Adopting 'pidof' from sysvinit-tools
- From: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Hi guys.
I found this forgotten request in my queue.
Do you have any idea what the best way is?
Should I take the killall5 source, strip it and introduce
as a new tool (directly called 'pidof' without linking)?
Please, let me know.
Regards,
Jaromir.
--
Jaromir Capik
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
Software Engineer / BaseOS
Email: jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
IC: 27690016
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Small" <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:59:14 PM
> Subject: [procps] Re: Adopting 'pidof' from sysvinit-tools
>
> and this one
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 07:53:50AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:34:27PM -0400, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> > > I just received a message from Karel Zak, that the 'pidof' tool
> > > needs to be adopted from sysvinit-tools (probably gonna be
> > > retired soon). He believes this tool is more suitable for
> > > procps than for util-linux. What do you guys think?
> > > I personally like that idea.
> >
> > That's so funny because I removed the pidof remnant code out of killall
> > (and made killall kill ALLL). I have no problem adopting it into procps.
> >
> > - Craig
> > --
> > Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
> > Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
> > GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
>
> --
> Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
> Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
> GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
>
>
Other related posts:
