One interesting tidbit about linguistic drift. According to an article on Scientific American I read several years ago, it has historically taken about 5,000 years for linguistic drift to generate two languages without commonalities from an original ancestral language. G. Guido Dante Corona IBM Research, Human Ability & Accessibility Center, (HA&AC) Austin Tx. Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able ". . . Maybe it was only those who were most certain they were right who were guaranteed to be wrong. And that maybe, just maybe, those who questioned the most were in the end those who came closest to being wise." [David Poyer, The Command] Ann Parsons <akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 01/14/2008 09:09 AM Please respond to bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: Rise And Fall Of The 3rd Reich Hi all, Yeh, Pratik, you're probably right. Written language doesn't shift as fast as does the spoken word. Guido's going by the common spoken usage. I haven't heard anyone use arouse in spoken English with its original connotation in decades. Just wait a few more and the written word will copy the spoken one. Just wait a generation and the verb To Skype will be placed right after Sky lark in the dictionary. <smiling> Ann P. -- Ann K. Parsons Portal Tutoring EMAIL: akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.portaltutoring.info "All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost." Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.