Hi all, What, Guido, you mean it has to have a "normal temperature"? Ann P. Original message:
The minimum acceptable accuracy for a 'good' book is 98.6%. Anything less is a candidate for rejection. G.
Guido Dante Corona IBM Research, Human Ability & Accessibility Center, (HA&AC) Austin Tx. Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able <http://www.ibm.com/able>
". . . Maybe it was only those who were most certain they were right who were guaranteed to be wrong. And that maybe, just maybe, those who questioned the most were in the end those who came closest to being wise."[David Poyer, The Command]
"E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/15/2008 06:57 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fair Quality Scans: No Longer Accepted
I have never tried that method. What is the minimum for a book to be rated "good" rather than "fair" using the system you describe?
E.
At 07:51 PM 1/15/2008, you wrote:A validator could just take the book to Step 2 and do an abortive upload - that is, upload the book to Step 2 before even beginning to work on it, and then close the browser window before hitting either of the approve or reject buttons - and get a recognition figure. If it is below the minimum, then he/she can either reject at that point, or decide whether it is worth a cleanup to get it above that figure.
Hopefully, in the not too distant future, books will be evaluated at submission in a similar manner to that which they undergo after validation.
Evan
----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:37 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fair Quality Scans: No Longer Accepted
What is to prevent a submitter just saying the submit is "good" instead of "fair" and not improving the quality of the submit? There is nothing in the system which judges a book at time of submission is there?
E.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
__________ NOD32 2792 (20080115) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com <http://www.eset.com/>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxput the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
-- Ann K. Parsons Portal Tutoring EMAIL: akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.portaltutoring.info "All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost."Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.