He is qualified for any branch. Because he is demonstrably an idiot.
On 2019-07-10 17:27, anthony@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
"100.0000% safe"
4 zero safe propellant. What branch of the government does he work for?
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf
Of Henry Spencer
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:41 PM
To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AR] Re: alcohols (was Re: Re: ADN Q?)
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Anthony Cesaroni wrote:
What does this have to do with ADN? ... where did the thread digress
in using it for life support or did I miss something?
Craig thinks any propellant that doesn't give him the warm fuzzies as being
100.0000% safe is unacceptable for use in a manned spacecraft, so he was
objecting to the methanol used in some of the ionic-liquid monoprops.
Never mind that his own examples of "human rated" propellants so far have
all been things which you *really* don't want in your air or splattered
around your cabin. There are hardly any useful propellants, and certainly
no useful oxidizers, which aren't aggressive enough to kill you somehow, a
fact that he hasn't figured out yet. The answer to this, of course, is to
do your engineering properly so that the propellants don't *get* into your
air or your cabin.
Henry
