[procps] Re: w and "make check"
- From: Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:05:35 +1000
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:25:37AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the point is to make the tests stable and allow for the debate as to the
> expected output in other locales to continue in parallel. the tests are for
> functionality, not making sure localizations stay up to date.
That's exactly correct. My main priority was to ensure the tests pass
for everyone no matter what is their native locale.
A second question then is; for this specific line are we handling
localisation correctly? Or what is the right way of doing this.
> lack of contributed translation for strings is not a valid reason for
> disabling localization everywhere. the correct answer is to fix the missing
> translation strings. feel free to contribute some.
Ah, that's another question to discuss.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Other related posts:
