[GeoStL] Re: Should I Attach A Photo To My Caches?
- From: GC-RGS <gc-rgs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:53:56 -0600
-
I agree with Dan on this one. I think pictures are nice to have available if
someone wanted to see what the area was like. If I'm going caching to an
area of multiple caches, I'd look at the pictures but hit the cache either
way. But, if it was a long drive and the only cache around or on the way,
then seeing the picture of the area could convince me to make the trip. I
like the pictures.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Henke" <thunder_monk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 9:38 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Should I Attach A Photo To My Caches?
> -
> Greg,
>
> I have hunted caches that had pictures attached and
> frankly it makes no difference to me if there is or
> isn't.....as long as the picture is not a spoiler
> aka....showing the cache in it's location.....what's
> the fun of that .....there needs to be some mystery or
> caching is not nearly as much fun....a picture of the
> area or a picture of a special feature is nice and
> there have been times that I have looked at a picture
> of the surrounding area and then went to find the
> cache because of that feature .....but I hunt for the
> thrill of the chase and the find so I will take it
> either way...
>
> Dan (Thunder)
>
> --- Greg Ponder <thehairyhillbilly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Since I live in the boonies and have very few caches
> > available to find, I've been hiding caches. Someone
> > suggested that I attach photos of the area where
> > I've hidden the cache.
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info.
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs......
****************************************************************************
Other related posts:
