[GeoStL] Re: Should I Attach A Photo To My Caches?

  • From: Michael Chambers <michaelc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:16:28 -0600

- I think some sort of "Vista" photo would be a nice incentive to seek it out.  I just wouldn't include a photo, with a blinking arrow and caption saying; "Cache is right here!"

Leanman
Mike Chambers

Greg Ponder wrote:

Since I live in the boonies and have very few caches available to find, I've been hiding caches. Someone suggested that I attach photos of the area where I've hidden the cache. My whole purpose of hiding caches is to make people aware of some great scenery, so the suggestion makes some sense. However, I'm worried that it will ruin the surprise--that the "Wow! I'm glad I bushwhacked across three states to see this place" will be reduced to "Well, I think the picture's better."

What does everyone think? Would you go regardless of whether or not a picture is attached? Or would a picture get you moving more quickly?

I appreciate the input and thank you in advance.

The Hairy Hillbilly

(Who May Soon Have More Caches Hidden Than Caches Found!)

 



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

**************************************************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching The SLAGA E-store is closed for image repairs...... ****************************************************************************

Other related posts: