No Kelly, I am not assuming that a bad book is immediately or even eventually rescanned. I only wish that people's time is used effectively. As I already said, you can spend an inordinate amount of time fixing a bad book, or spend the same time working on 4 good or excellent submissions. Are you really serving your customers by working for a long time on a single book? GUido Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. Research Division, Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able "Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/28/2004 09:57 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: txt page breaks redux Guido, You're still assuming that someone has access to all these books and can provide a better scan. If I had a choice between spending twenty hours fixing a scrambled scan or being given a copy of the book and asked to rescan it, of course I would rather scan. But usually the choice is fix up the book, or reject it and not have it at all. Of course I know that a volunteer in this position can mention the problem on list and someone might go find the book and rescan, and/or they can ask Rui to add the book to the list with hopefully the same outcome. As for me, I validate things I want to read. Self-interest to be sure, although not credit-based. I actually like reading a book and fixing the errors as I go along, and I take pride in the fact that when I upload the book it will be as close to perfect as I can make it. Of course, it's a real pleasure to have a scan that's so good I don't have to do much or any correcting. And if the submitter says that they've already read the book through I wouldn't necessarily read the whole thing before uploading. And my point is... hm, I thought I had one... Oh, never mind! Kellie