[bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page
- From: "Louise" <lougou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 11:01:21 -0600
I also think there should be two separate lists, one for those books which
have never been validated and one for those books that were bounced back for
different reasons such as checking for page breaks, fair rating status, etc.
This might make it less confusing for everyone instead of having everything
lumped together. Just my two cents' worth!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Pietruk" <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:48 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page
> Tif
>
> There is something else that bothers me about these bounce backs. The way
> this is done, unless one happens to check to see if their work bounces
> back, one would be clueless that this has occurred.
> Might it be possible that the system be set up so that any action taken by
> someone to
> a book generate an automated email both to the submitter and the latest
> validator?
> Right now, as I see it, the weak link in the BookShare system is the
> validation pool where books often books sit seemingly forever; and part of
> the reason may include just the kind of situation you stumbled upon.
> I recently stumbled upon a validation of mine that had a similar fate,
> resubmitted it from my hd, including the requested info.
> So far, while it hasn't yet made the collection, it hasn't bounced back
> either so I am keeping my fingers crossed that all is well with this book.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
