Excellent point Mary, this and many more requirements were voiced and recorded during the Bookshare User's meeting held in L.A. at CSUN 2004. Unfortunately I have not seen any of them implemented yet. On the other hand, we are entering a new year, and Benetech has an even better team on board. There may be hope that some site enhancements may see eventually the light of day. Without cracking a smile, of course! <chuckle!> Guido Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. Research Division, Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able "Mary Otten" <maryotten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/29/2004 02:08 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] possible improvement to website I guess this is for Marissa or whomever else from staff might monitor here. I think this has been raised before, but I thought I would raise it again, as I don't remember if it had been commented upon one way or the other. Do you think it would be possible for people who release a book back into the fvalidation pool to be able to include a comment as to why they were doing so, which comment would appear in the list of comments related to the book when somebody goes to upload it? If you get something that you don't feel like dealing with or can't deal with, but don't think is bad enough to warrant nuking, it would be nice to be able to let the next person who comes along see a comment as to why you released the book. It would help them know if its something they can deal with: e.g. there's a really garbled page and you can't find a copy in your local library, or maybe don't own a scanner so can't fix it. If you could put that comment, another validator who also didn't have a scanner would know not to take that book and leave it for somebody who could fix the problem. Mary