[bksvol-discuss] Re: Richard Laymon's In The Dark
- From: Pam Quinn <quinn.family@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:08:07 -0500
Thanks, Scot. I rejected it then in anticipation of a better scan.
Pam
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:49:30 -0400, you wrote:
>Hey Pam,
>
>Yep, I do plan to get to scanning that one eventually. I've got about four
>or five titles in the cue right now, but I'll snag it next time I'm at my
>favorite bookstore. They've got a wonderful used paperback bin, where I know
>I've come across it before for $1 or less.
>
>Scott
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pam Quinn" <quinn.family@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:03 PM
>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Richard Laymon's In The Dark
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was going to validate In The Dark, but there were thousands of
>> errors. I probably should have rejected it but I released it. Really
>> though it needs to be rescanned. Are you planning to scan it by any
>> chance, Scott? If you are then I'll download the old one and reject it
>> I know the policy is that if it's readable at all, best to have that
>> rather than not to have the book at all, but given the amount of money
>> that it apparently costs to put books on the site, and given that the
>> quality can be so much better, I would rather see a new scan of that
>> book. Thanks.
>>
>> Pam
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
