[AR] Re: Ionic orientation (was: Falcon 9 flight today)

  • From: Henry Spencer <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 22:16:25 -0400 (EDT)

On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, Norman Yarvin wrote:
> Of course, today we could do a lot more to detect and properly handle
> such "ion pockets" than they could with 1960s Soviet electronics.
> (Hmm, would their problem have been running into the Van Allen belts?)

Well, not literally so, not at the low altitudes used for manned 
spacecraft.  But the South Atlantic Anomaly (which is presumably what he 
means by the "Brazilian Magnetic Anomaly") is a place where the lower 
fringes of the inner belt hang down unusually low.  Problems could 
plausibly arise there, with large numbers of high-energy particles perhaps 
confusing simple sensors built for milder conditions.  (The SAA is 
generally a bad place to operate electronics, with high noise levels in 
imaging sensors, flipped bits in memories, etc.)

                                                           Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                      (hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
                                                        (regexpguy@xxxxxxxxx)


Other related posts: