RE: pga_aggregate_target
- From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 11:34:34 -0400
I think pga_aggregate_target affects only memory allocation not =
temporary space usage.
It might affect the frequency and the sizing of temp allocations but I =
think the total usage will be the same.
This is based on the assumption that total sort/hash/whatever space =
required to get the task done is higher than the allowed total memory =
allocation.
Waleed
-----Original Message-----
From: ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx [mailto:ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:04 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: pga_aggregate_target
I have alot of batch loading processes that run over night. A few them =
use 2GB or more of sort space in my temp tablespace. I know I can =
increase my pga_aggregate_target dynamically, however, I believe I read =
that oracle only allows 1 process to use up to 5% of the =
pga_aggregate_Target.
anyway to flex this up? I just need the extra sort space for a few =
operations at certain times.=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
