Before we go chasing rabbit trails, may I quote Dr. Teller's post, "We are researchers at Northeastern University and MIT who are developing a high-resolution tactile display intended to provide blind people with a way to gather visual input through their fingertips. The display, based on MEMS (micro-electromechanical systems) technology, will have roughly one "tactel" (or tactile pixel) per millimeter in both horizontal and vertical dimensions, and will accommodate touch by several fingertips simultaneously rather than just one. Thus it will have both higher spatial resolution, and more total area, than the Optacon." The section of his post which seems to have become decontextualized, distorted beyond recognition, and woefully mischaracterized occurs a paragraph beyond the previous quote. And, as it is a longer and more complex construction mixing several potentialities of the device, more than a passing reading may be required to staunch the current wounds in the Epistemological realities encapsulated in this passage of Dr. Teller's post, "One use case would involve coupling the device to sensors integrated unobtrusively into clothing, to provide real-time information about the wearer's surroundings, including: orientation with respect to the compass or landmarks; mobility hazards such as obstacles and dropoffs; the presence, identities and motion of any people nearby; the presence and contents of nearby signage; and other aspects of the environment, to be determined in consultation with users. (In this way the device would produce sensations at the fingertips analogous to those on the tongue described in Nick Dotson's recent posts.) The system would "interpret" raw sensor data to varying degrees as per the task and the user's preferences. For example, while names of approaching people might be displayed as Braille, the user could also elect to receive raw data directly, for example to read distant signage or to feel the shape of others' faces at a remove. And of course the system would support an Optacon-like mode in which the user could move the retina across any document or object in order to experience a minimally interpreted tactile version of whatever data the retina was capturing." May we return to critiquing the proposal rather than these speculations based on the history of other device designs which historically haven't come even close to manufacture and unseating the capabilities of our Optacon in We Product Orphan's hands, hearts, imaginations, and minds. A new device can't dethrone the Optacon's legendary mythic status in our minds... Or can it? (mischievous grin) Nick -----Original Message----- From: optacon-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optacon-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Catherine Thomas Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 7:56 PM To: optacon-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [optacon-l] Fingers and Brains TeleSensory did a lot of research and testing before they chose the size of the Optacon display and the resolution (space between individual pins). Other fingers can be taught to read with the Optacon just as they can be taught to read braille. It does take training and practice, a sort of finger-education. Those who ever tried to read micro-braile know why it never caught on even though more content would have fit on pages. The resolution was just too close and the brain could not comprehend it. Those of us who had Cannon Optacons discovered that the smaller display provided less detail and images which were less clear and less able to be fine-tuned. There is a lot we don't know about brains and fingers, but we do know some and I think we should keep in mind what we painfully already learned. When I'm reading, I'm reading. Using other body parts besides my hands does not appeal to me personally. Catherine ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -Catherine Thomas braille@xxxxxxxxx / ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- to view the list archives, go to: www.freelists.org/archives/optacon-l To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject. Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject. to view the list archives, go to: www.freelists.org/archives/optacon-l To unsubscribe at any time, just send a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject. Tell your friends about the list. They can subscribe by sending a message to: optacon-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "subscribe" (without the quotes) in the message subject.