- Well--I assume those "hairs" were actually the rootlets. It was not invasive all over the area at either cache we found. It was just the vine circling the tree with the 35mm tucked under it. Used the gloves and washed the hands, but wondered if we were the only ones that thought that was PI. I got a really bad case(s) of PI last fall. It just wouldn't go away. Kept breaking out with more of it days and even weeks later with no more exposure. Switched shoes, washed all the clothes, etc., but kept getting more bumps. It literally took a couple months to clear up and I still have white splotches (scars) where it was in places. Really don't want to go down that road again. Even now, I wipe down with diaper wipes on my arms and legs every time we come out of the woods from a cache. [GeoStL] Re: Poison Ivy & Caching to Pensacola - *From*: "Jim Bensman" <junkmailno@xxxxxxxxxxx> - *To*: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - *Date*: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:20:43 -0500 - It may be poison ivy, but it could be a non poisonous non native species. PI has aerial rootlets when it climbs trees. If it does not have those rootlets, it is not PI. In our area there is a non native vine that has escaped into the wild that has a vine that looks real close to PI. If there are leaves on it, it is simple to tell apart. PI has three leaflets. The other has a simple leaf (i.e., one part not three). The other plant is an invasive species. It generally will cover the area. So if you can see an infestation of that plant, it is likely not PI. But sometimes PI will grow with it. So unless there are leaves on it (leaves of three (really leaflets) leave it be), I would suggest assuming it is PI. Jim Bensman "Nature Bats Last" **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw