[bksvol-discuss] Re: rejected two books.
- From: "Kim Friedman" <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:10:32 -0700
Bless you Jill. I love deranged perfectionist submitters like yourself for
when I'm in a jam you relieve my mind so I can continue with what I'm doing,
hopefully making your file look really good. Regards, Kim.
_____
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jill O'Connell
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 8:59 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: rejected two books.
Not only can but should. The days when Bookshare wanted scans, no matter of
what quality, are gone. and in my opinion,, the burden of finding missing
words shouldn't be placed on the proofreader. The scanner should read the
book he scans.
----- Original Message -----
From: robert <mailto:roberttweedy@xxxxxxx> tweedy
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 8:02 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] rejected two books.
I rejected two books marked for murder and silent protector. These books
where held for someone else but that person had their name taken off. The
submitter didn't hold down the book firmly and didn't leave their email
address so I have always thought this and maybe I am wrong but a lot of
proof readers don't have time to get a book where there is junk on every
page where the submitter didn't hold down the book so why proof readers take
their time to clean up the books? Yes we need to do that too but the
submitters can do it too.
_____
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3052 - Release Date: 08/05/10
06:35:00
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5347 (20100806) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5347 (20100806) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5348 (20100806) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
