[bksvol-discuss] Re: plan to scan

  • From: "Sarah Van Oosterwijck" <curiousentity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:56:47 -0500

Actually the standards for excellent aren't that high. Any time you consider a percentage as a rating that will be the case. Just think of how many words are in a book. Now if the accuracy was 99 percent that would still mean that 1 out of a hundred words could be wrong. Now think of how fast the average person reads. Let's say 180 words a minute just because it is an easy number to devide. That would mean that with a book that had an accuracy of 99 percent you would on average find an error three times a minute. Ug! Of course some of the so-called inaccuracy would actually be words that the spell checker just didn't know, but there would also be words that the spell check would think correct but weren't correct there. I'm not sure it pays any attention to junk characters and words with numbers in them. It certainly won't notice punctuation problems. It certainly can't tell anything about words that are completely missing from the page and that is extremely obvious and a serious problem to a human reader.

The ratings do count inaccuracy a little more precisely than I have, though. If I do my math correctly, which is always doubtful, in a book with 99.9 percent accuracy you would be finding an error every 3.3 minutes, which is still farely often. Since that is just an average it doesn't reflect reality very well. You probably experience the errors by reading along for a long time then finding some mess that accounts for more than one error and then go on to read another section of non-mess.

Remember that the ratings are first assigned by the submitter, so the rating given on the download for validation page for the book probably was guessed at by the submitter and may or may not have anything to do with reality. The rating given by the bookshare system is only assigned at the time of approval by the validator. The value you see when you want to download a book from the collection is usually going to be determined by the automated system, but a validator can override the rating chosen by the system. I would hope the validator's assessment is more accurate than the system's if they change it.

Now if this message actually makes sense, I've accomplished something fantastic for a person who hasn't felt good enough to write E-mail or even try to edit anything I've read lately. And that is dispite the fact that I can use my computer from anywhere in the living room or kitchen. Actually the cordless keyboard works in more of the house, but I either can't hear my synthesizer from the other rooms or wouldn't want to use a computer from those particular rooms anyway. ;-)

Sarah Van Oosterwijck
Assistive Technology Trainer
http://home.earthlink.net/~netentity

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:34 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: plan to scan



Gerald, Thanks for the explanation. Maybe I will eventually learn how Bookshare works if I scan long enough. Knowing that I wonder how some books get an excellent rating when they are not. On the other hand, I am reading a book right now that is such an excellent scan that I forget it's not a Web Braille book so we know what the potential to aim for is. Thanks again.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/82 - Release Date: 8/25/2005


Other related posts: