Nope, the spellchecker just didn't see them, even if it should have. Maybe it doesn't see the optional dash as even existing. Tracy At 01:48 PM 8/24/05 -0700, you wrote: >It's possible that the split words were compound >words. Therefore, each half of the word would be a >genuine word by itself and so the spell checker >wouldn't find it mis-spelled -- whereas if a word like > cor pulent were split, the spell-checker probably >would catch it (he word comes to mind because I've >been reading about Henry VIII) > >CIndy > >--- Tracy Carcione <carcione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Oddly enough, Spellchecker did not find the split >> words. >> Tracy >> >> > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >