[bksvol-discuss] Re: copyright question

  • From: "Scott Blanks" <scottsjb@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:40:34 -0400

Thanks Jake. You and all the other listers always seem to have all the answers. And that is very encouraging for someone who is still new at the art of scanning and validating.

Scott


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jake Brownell" <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:26 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: copyright question


Hey Scott,
   Nope, definitely doesn't need a new copyright. Sometimes new publishers
put out a different edition/format of the same material. So  a different
ISBN, but the old copyright stands.

Approved one earlier today in fact that was copyright in 1985, but that
particular Aladdin paperback had begun printing in 1997.

Cheers!
Jake
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Blanks" <scottsjb@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] copyright question


Hi all,

Just finished scanning a book which was originally copyrighted in 1989. It
was recently republished, but the only visible copyright says 1989. So, my
question is, when a book is republished, does it *have* to have a new
copyright, or is what I've just described common, newly published, but
with 
an older copyright?

Thanks,
Scott




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 8/3/2005






Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. bksvol-discuss
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2005