[bksvol-discuss] Re: copyright question
- From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:23:46 -0400
Actually both situations can be common.
Though, a lot of books get republished, particularly popular ones.
The copyright if there is a new one will say "Copyright renewed" and the
date.
So the 1989 is accurate in this case.
Shelley L. Rhodes and Judson, guiding golden
juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Guide Dogs For the Blind Inc.
Graduate Advisory Council
www.guidedogs.com
The vision must be followed by the venture. It is not enough to
stare up the steps - we must step up the stairs.
-- Vance Havner
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Blanks" <scottsjb@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:23 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] copyright question
Hi all,
Just finished scanning a book which was originally copyrighted in 1989. It
was recently republished, but the only visible copyright says 1989. So, my
question is, when a book is republished, does it *have* to have a new
copyright, or is what I've just described common, newly published, but with
an older copyright?
Thanks,
Scott
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 8/3/2005
Other related posts:
