Hmmm, Judy, I think you meant
volunteer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
not .com.
Evan
From: Judy s.
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 4:10 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Problem with the Conversion System?
Hi Ann,
I sure hope you're sending this concern to the volunteer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx email,
and not just here. I'm not certain if anyone on the staff regularly reads email
that's on this list, so I'd would send it to that email address, if you haven't
already.
Judy s.
Follow me on Twitter at QuackersNCheese
On 5/29/2017 6:56 AM, Ann Parsons wrote:
Hi all,
Well, as the old farmer's wife said, "If I knowed you was comin', I'd have
baked a cake."
You nailed it on the head. If I had only known I would have written to
Volunteer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and probably gotten an answer. I rejected the book
because I couldn't get the info I needed like chapter headings. Apparently,
the chapter headings were graphics or something, so they didn't scan. So I had
no idea except my best guess as to where they were supposed to go. Frustrating
because there really wasn't much else wrong with the book.
It would be truly helpful if the volunteer coordinator would spend a little
more time on this list, and be available to answer questions. What would be
even more helpful is actually receiving a notification about such things
instead of having to throw away perfectly good work through ignorance.
I guess I sound a bit frustrated, but really, a newsletter about once every
three months is hardly communication with one's volunteers.
Twitter is available, so is facebook, so is this list. using it to remind
volunteers that wish List scans are done by staff and if there are questions
one should write to Volunteer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx is vital information, IMO. <grrr>
That was a good book, too. It was a star Trek book, and I was interested in
it. <sigh>
Ann P.
