[bksvol-discuss] Re: Another Validation Question
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:03:26 -0600
<lol> What I saw was donedone. I am positive! <smile>
----- Original Message -----
From: <talmage@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Another Validation Question
Hi Sue,
I think what you are getting are the automatic responses placed in by the
system. What it seems to do is run words together without spaces. Are you
sure what you got wasn't doneedit for done edit?
Dave
At 10:48 AM 12/10/2004, you wrote:
>Hi Dave and everyone,
>
>On the download page in the place where it tells about the return, edit,
>submit stuff, I have seen the term "donedone". Is that double talk or
what?
>(smile)
>
>Sue
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <talmage@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 7:30 AM
>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Another Validation Question
>
>
>In addition to what Mary has already mentioned, you may come across some
>other cases where the book has an accepted date and 2 submission
>dates. One case I know of is if an administrator places a copy of a book
>that is in the library, on to the download page for a volunteer to work
on.
>
>Dave
>
>At 12:17 AM 12/10/2004, you wrote:
> >Alison,
> >If it says submit, that's the original scanner who submitted it. Return
> >means that it came back to the list, either because somebody's time ran
> >out or they released it. Sometimes, it says edit time expired. If its
>actually
> >been validated, you will see something like action valid and some numbers
> >of some kind and then what sounds to me like donedone. And then if you
see
> >comments after that, they should be from the admin asking
> >something or commentingon the reason why the book has been sent back
after
> >it has been deemed valid by a validator. But submit and return are the
> >normal things under comments that indicate the original
> >submission and the various edit sessions that didn't result in
validation.
> >You shouldn't see more than one submitter for a book, I don't think.
> >Mary
Other related posts:
