Cindy, Why did you hang on to it so long, without validating it? I don't understand. Tracy At 09:56 AM 8/31/05 -0700, you wrote: >Tracy, > >When I looked last night it was back on the download >list with a request to please put in the complete >title. > >Yes, I had it and kept renewing it, because it had >been on the download list for at least 6 months. I >didn't take anything, in February 2005, that hadn't >been submitted after August 2004, and some of the >books, perhaps that one, had been there since May. > >It didn't really look that bad, and I had asked the >submitter if she wanted to validate and submit it but >she didn't want to. I released it, finally, because >Gary said he would re-scan the books the books I had. >I did mention that that one looked pretty good and was >rated Good. The others were rated Fair and were >actually Poor. > >I'm glad you took it and validated and approved it. I >just checked and I see that it's no longer on the >download list. Hopefully you're the one who took it >again and put in whatever the missing words from the >title were and uploaded and approved it again, because >if someone else took it they won't have the work you >did on it. > >Thank you. > >Cindy > > >--- Tracy Carcione <carcione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Someone was asking what was wrong with A Cultured >> Handmaiden. The answer is >> nothing. Someone just sat on it for 8 months, >> faithfully renewing every >> week, until she missed one and her time expired, at >> which point I snagged it >> aon a Friday and uploaded it on the following >> Tuesday with headers fixed and >> spelling checked. There really was very little that >> needed doing. There was >> no reason for it to sit on step 1 for a year. It >> was the thing Mike >> complains about, long-term renewing. >> Tracy >> >> >> > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >