On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, John Schilling wrote: > > And if you want a liquid fuel as the end result, the optimal chemistry > > likely won't have molecular hydrogen as an intermediate product... > > > Molecular hydrogen, humph. I want a car that runs on atomic hydrogen. > A car, and a rocket ship. Atomic hydrogen would be worth the bother of > cryogenic storage... Well, maybe. There is this problem with a positive heat of formation that has too many digits before the decimal point, and an activation energy that has too many digits after. It's the great-grandmother of all energetic monopropellants, for sure... with all that implies. When the fuel makes nitroglycerin look like dishwater, and the slightest *failure* of cryogenic storage will let its true personality emerge, there is still such a thing as it being too much bother! "Huh? The tank vent valve has opened..." "RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!" Henry Spencer henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) (regexpguy@xxxxxxxxx)