[AR] Re: arocket Digest V1 #58
- From: John Schilling <John.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 05:42:58 -0800
Norman Yarvin
In any case, I'm with Henry Spencer on this: you're going to want a
liquid fuel as the end result. Trying to maintain millions of
installations of an exotic technology, one in each car, is just not
going to be competitive with maintaining just a few large-scale
installations of an exotic technology in centralized
liquid-fuel-production facilities.
And if you want a liquid fuel as the end result, the optimal chemistry
likely won't have molecular hydrogen as an intermediate product
(though it might).
Molecular hydrogen, humph. I want a car that runs on atomic hydrogen.
A car, and a rocket ship. Atomic hydrogen would be worth the bother of
cryogenic storage...
John Schilling
john.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(661) 718-0955
Other related posts:
- » [AR] Re: arocket Digest V1 #58 - John Schilling
