You could use a jetpak for a landing that might be the only real useful
use of one lol (not really). 10 min wingsuit flight 5 min jetpak
landing.
If you're lazy you could use the jetpak to get you to the takeoff point
I guess too.
Stall speed is in the 60mph range could it be done? Probably with a nice
headwind and a belly pan strapped to your underside. lol don't screw up
though lol
That guy did not land in the water though it's just fake fake fake.
Monroe
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [AR] Re: SpaceX Single Stage to Orbit
From: roxanna Mason <rocketmaster.ken@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2019 5:49 pm
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's the stall speed plus ground effect all help reduce impact trauma.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:02 AM Monroe L. King Jr. <
monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Parachute is optional.
https://youtu.be/o2xmAWS4akE?t=100
FAKE lol so fake.
-------- Original Message --------but
Subject: [AR] Re: SpaceX Single Stage to Orbit
From: Craig Fink <webegood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, May 22, 2019 7:01 pm
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hydrogen tanks have better crumple zones and lower terminal velocities,
I still think you should consider having a reserve parachute. With awrote:
properly designed entry suit you should be able to eject anywhere!
The Parachute is optional.
https://youtu.be/o2xmAWS4akE?t=100
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:05 AM David Summers <dvidsum@xxxxxxxxx>
With
Oh, I don't know, it will probably reach rest with respect to ground.
wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx>a good enough crash couch might even be survivable!
On Wed, May 22, 2019, 12:58 PM William Claybaugh <
reentry.wrote:
Craig:
There is not enough mass reserve on this vehicle to land it after
stage.
Bill
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 07:24, Craig Fink <webegood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill,
Landing Propellant mass fraction used for delta-V should be
significantly less for this prototype than for the Falcon 9 first
toThe Fly-Back Burn and the Entry Burn are unnecessary, so it's only
necessary to have enough delta-V to slow down from Terminal Velocity
wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx>zero at the ground.
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:51 AM William Claybaugh <
seenwrote:
Not fully reusable; there will not be sufficient propellant to land.
Time will tell as SpaceX is walking down a flexible path, they are
apparently taking two paths right now, to their goal. From what I've
controlso far, the landing legs are an integral part of the aerodynamic
acrosssurfaces so probably wouldn't be taken off. Like an aircraft flying
thePacific, one would not expect the aircraft to carry enough fuel for
to letreturn trip. For a Launch Vehicle, the Destination is LEO, a place
forpassengers and cargo off, take on new passenger and cargo and Refuel
vehicle. Whenthe return trip. Refueling in LEO is already a goal for this
wrote:refueling is added to the Prototype? Time will tell.
Bill
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 05:47, Craig Fink <webegood@xxxxxxxxx>
vehicle, capable
Looks like we are close to seeing the first Single Stage to Orbit
launch. As a bonus, this launch should be a fully reusable
step on theof Entry and Landing. Plus, this accomplishment will be just a
version ofpath to his new launch vehicle, as the SSTO is SpaceX's research
NewsStarship's second stage.
https://youtu.be/6IydYEBrk0E?t=413
CloudLicker on Youtube seems to do a good job aggregating SpaceX
1960s.so you don't have to.
Following SpaceX today is what following NASA was like in the
All Doing, less Talk. Exciting times ahead.--
Craig Fink
WeBeGood@xxxxxxxxx
--
Craig Fink
WeBeGood@xxxxxxxxx
--
Craig Fink
WeBeGood@xxxxxxxxx